Role-semantic assignments provide priors over how heterogeneous agents may coordinate, but cooperative MARL systems instead settle on conventions through decentralized, non-stationary learning, with no guarantee that the resulting structure matches those priors. We study this translation gap between theory-informed role expectations and learned coordination structure through a diagnostic combining a role-routing matrix, formation sensitivity ($Δ_{\max}$), and gradient/occlusion attribution across three-role MiniGrid and SMACv2 (Terran) environments.
We show that label-conditioned attention produces substantially more concentrated and role-specific routing than flat MLP baselines, remains stable under 3v3--9v9 scaling, transfers zero-shot across team sizes, and is invariant to ally-slot padding. A 5-seed re-evaluation shows partial alignment between learned conventions and designer-specified priors while revealing where small-n noise can manufacture apparent strategic divergence.
We present these results as an empirical framework for measuring coordination structure in cooperative MARL rather than as a new equilibrium concept or causal explanation.
