We examine how prompt tone affects both accuracy of the LLM answers and inference cost as reflected in output-token consumption. Experiments were performed to understand the trade-offs between accuracy and inference cost on a 570 Question MMLU dataset for LLM models prompted in seven different tones from sycophantic to threatening.

Our results show that the output-token-length variation substantially exceeded accuracy variation across all models. Output-token consumption varied by up to 44.3% across tone conditions.

We also analyzed the tradeoff between the accuracy of the answers and the average output token length in the reasoning process. For the ChatGPT models 4o and 5-nano, the rude tone is quite dominant.

For the Gemini models 2.5 Flash and 2.5 Flash Lite, the rude and neutral tones are dominant on the Pareto-optimal frontier. We find that prompt tone influences not only answer quality but also the amount of billable inference resources consumed by modern LLMs.