CAM-Guided Saliency Cutout and Image-Based Malware Classification
2608.11634

Authors

Yasaman Ebrahimi,Martin Jurecek,Mark Stamp

Abstract

Dropout regularization is commonly used to reduce overfitting by removing parts of a neural network during training. For Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), cutouts serve a somewhat analogous purpose.

Cutouts can be implemented as data augmentation: the original training image is retained, and additional copies are created with regions removed. In this chapter, we test whether cutout placement can be improved by using High-Resolution Class Activation Mapping (HiResCAM).

We compare four controlled training conditions: no cutout, standard random cutout, low-saliency cutout, and high-saliency cutout. We experiment using grayscale malware images from the RawMal-TF dataset (17 families with1,000 samples per family), and for comparison to natural images, we experiment with the well-known CIFAR-100 dataset. All experiments are based on ResNet18 with100 training epochs. For the cutout experiments, we test cutout areas of5%, 10%, 20%, and30%, and we consider~$M\in\{4,8}$ augmented copies per original training image. The RawMal-TF results are slightly worse for all three cutout cases (random, high and low saliency) as compared to no cutouts.

In contrast, our CIFAR-100 experimental results improve slightly under low-saliency cutout. These results suggest that the value of saliency-guided cutout is domain dependent, and that malware images should not be treated as equivalent to natural images.

Resources

Ray graphicRay graphicRay graphicRay graphic

Stay in the loop

Every AI paper that matters, free in your inbox daily.

Details

  • takara.ai
  • Custom AI and machine learning from the Frontier Research Team.
  • © 2026 takara.ai Ltd
  • Content is sourced from third-party publications.
Ray graphicRay graphicRay graphic