BagShift: Measuring How Patch Selection Changes the Evidence Seen by Whole-Slide MIL
2608.15970

Authors

Liwei Hu,Anbang Wang,Haijie Xu,Jiawei Luo,Guang Yang

Abstract

Whole-slide multiple-instance learning (MIL) observes only the patches admitted by its selector. Deployment can alter this selector through compute limits, tissue masking, or regional workflows, even when the patch count is unchanged.

We introduce BagShift, a paired protocol that changes the selector for the same case while holding its features and predictor fixed, thereby isolating selector response from case mix. With equal 128-patch budgets, sampling across the tissue or concentrating around one coordinate exposes markedly different evidence: on PANDA, the two views reduce quadratic weighted kappa by 1.57 and 17.96 points, respectively (QWK reported on the $\times100$ scale).

On CAMELYON16, lesion annotations withheld from model development show that localized views retain tumor in only 10.0% of micrometastatic observations, and matched exposure does not consistently recover the loss. The same fixed-count stressor produces a much smaller response on external lung subtyping, although differences in relative coverage make cross-task severity descriptive.

When repeated localized observations are available, unioning their patches before one nonlinear MIL pass improves PANDA QWK by 7.87 points over averaging regional predictions. Patch count specifies computation, not observed evidence; deployment evaluations should report both what a selector preserves and how repeated observations are aggregated.

Resources

Ray graphicRay graphicRay graphicRay graphic

Stay in the loop

Every AI paper that matters, free in your inbox daily.

Details

  • takara.ai
  • Custom AI and machine learning from the Frontier Research Team.
  • © 2026 takara.ai Ltd
  • Content is sourced from third-party publications.
Ray graphicRay graphicRay graphic