What Do CAE Simulation Agents Really Need Beyond a Generic Harness?
2609.03718

Authors

Jiasheng Shi,Tianhan Zhang

Abstract

Computer-aided engineering (CAE) simulation is among the largest and most demanding areas of engineering, where setting up a solver such as OpenFOAM, FEniCS, or COMSOL takes real expertise. Large language model (LLM) agents promise to turn a natural-language request into a working simulation, and recent CAE agents add simulation-specific machinery: multi-agent decomposition, domain retrieval, and scripted reflection.

That machinery suited weak base models; modern harnesses already supply multi-turn reasoning, tool use, and execution feedback. We ask what a CAE simulation agent still needs beyond a generic harness.

With information access and repair budget held fixed, a single-agent harness matches or beats multi-agent specialized systems (FoamBench 96.4% vs.\ 88.2%). Ablations trace this to capabilities the harness already provides: execution-feedback repair lifts FoamBench from 71.8% with no repair round to 96.4%, while scripted reflection adds nothing.

The one input that still helps is domain knowledge supplied as solver tutorials, our largest measured gain (80.9% to 96.4%).

Resources

Ray graphicRay graphicRay graphicRay graphic

Stay in the loop

Every AI paper that matters, free in your inbox daily.

Details

  • takara.ai
  • Custom AI and machine learning from the Frontier Research Team.
  • © 2026 takara.ai Ltd
  • Content is sourced from third-party publications.
Ray graphicRay graphicRay graphic